<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pakistan Are Back&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/</link>
	<description>Welcome to Stani Army {Sta (star), ni (nee) Army} – The home of UK Pakistan Cricket supporters. A website dedicated to the game of cricket - Pakistan. Blog, News, Poll, Shop and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maza786</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10398</link>
		<dc:creator>Maza786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10398</guid>
		<description>Pakistan dismal tour ended on a high with 3 consecutive victories. Although the joyfulness appeared in vain, Pakistan showed some promising signs in the latter stages of the shortened format. Imran Nazir has achieved a 100% record since his comeback in green colours. He played some effective cameos and set the tone for the day with some early momentum. Rana Naved’s credentials also were seen and suggested why he deserves to be recognised as a player of international class. And finally let me credit the emergence of Umar Akmal which was as impressive introduction to say the least.

Also let me mention the T20 victory and Shahid Afridi’s leadership enforcement on that day. He commenced his captaincy regime with a sparkle as Pakistan once more stamped their glorified status as T20 champions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistan dismal tour ended on a high with 3 consecutive victories. Although the joyfulness appeared in vain, Pakistan showed some promising signs in the latter stages of the shortened format. Imran Nazir has achieved a 100% record since his comeback in green colours. He played some effective cameos and set the tone for the day with some early momentum. Rana Naved’s credentials also were seen and suggested why he deserves to be recognised as a player of international class. And finally let me credit the emergence of Umar Akmal which was as impressive introduction to say the least.</p>
<p>Also let me mention the T20 victory and Shahid Afridi’s leadership enforcement on that day. He commenced his captaincy regime with a sparkle as Pakistan once more stamped their glorified status as T20 champions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ for Stani Army</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10395</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ for Stani Army</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10395</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a terrible cough you got there sis....you ought to get it looked at.

...and you support the team, otherwise you wouldn&#039;t be on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a terrible cough you got there sis&#8230;.you ought to get it looked at.</p>
<p>&#8230;and you support the team, otherwise you wouldn&#8217;t be on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: undercoversister</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10388</link>
		<dc:creator>undercoversister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10388</guid>
		<description>hahaha, this is why I support the sport, not the teams *cough* glory supporter *cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha, this is why I support the sport, not the teams *cough* glory supporter *cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ for Stani Army</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10319</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ for Stani Army</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10319</guid>
		<description>Maz,
Email me at the address in &quot;contact&quot; up there, and I will re-send it to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maz,<br />
Email me at the address in &#8220;contact&#8221; up there, and I will re-send it to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maza786</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10318</link>
		<dc:creator>maza786</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10318</guid>
		<description>Sorry Stani I didn&#039;t receive your email ????????(:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Stani I didn&#8217;t receive your email ????????(:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ for Stani Army</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10317</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ for Stani Army</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10317</guid>
		<description>Wasim,
Yes, I was speaking generally in our Test side. Butt and Akmal would be the best option from this squad but I would have Akmal and Shehzad as my Test openers in general.

Jamshed is impressive too. They brought him in a while ago and then drop him  for no obvious reason.

Akmal&#039;s brother Umar scored another impressive knock. Soon they&#039;ll have to make space for him down the order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasim,<br />
Yes, I was speaking generally in our Test side. Butt and Akmal would be the best option from this squad but I would have Akmal and Shehzad as my Test openers in general.</p>
<p>Jamshed is impressive too. They brought him in a while ago and then drop him  for no obvious reason.</p>
<p>Akmal&#8217;s brother Umar scored another impressive knock. Soon they&#8217;ll have to make space for him down the order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wasim</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10316</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10316</guid>
		<description>Shahzad is not in the team, Q told me that. So Butt will stay unfortunately.
This is how the senior mafia protects each other.
That is why they  players like Azhar Ali and Nasir Jamshed don&#039;t get a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shahzad is not in the team, Q told me that. So Butt will stay unfortunately.<br />
This is how the senior mafia protects each other.<br />
That is why they  players like Azhar Ali and Nasir Jamshed don&#8217;t get a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ for Stani Army</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10315</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ for Stani Army</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10315</guid>
		<description>Wasim,
Yes, I think to create a spot by removing one, or both, of our openers would be a good thing. I&#039;m even having doubts about Butt now. He seems too limited in his choice of shots (thus easy to defend against) and gives his wicket away too easily, bringing pressure on number three who has to in effect, bat as an opener. 

My openers for Tests would be Akmal and Shehzad. From what I&#039;ve seen so far, Shehzad has good technical ability and should be given the chance to play in a format where he doesn&#039;t have to manipulate shots and can take his time to build an innings. For ODIs and T20s I would have Akmal and Imran Nazir opening with Afridi at three!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasim,<br />
Yes, I think to create a spot by removing one, or both, of our openers would be a good thing. I&#8217;m even having doubts about Butt now. He seems too limited in his choice of shots (thus easy to defend against) and gives his wicket away too easily, bringing pressure on number three who has to in effect, bat as an opener. </p>
<p>My openers for Tests would be Akmal and Shehzad. From what I&#8217;ve seen so far, Shehzad has good technical ability and should be given the chance to play in a format where he doesn&#8217;t have to manipulate shots and can take his time to build an innings. For ODIs and T20s I would have Akmal and Imran Nazir opening with Afridi at three!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wasim</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10314</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10314</guid>
		<description>As regards Alam I agree with you if anything I would select Razzak ahead of Alam as You said.

One way to select Fawad is to drop Manzoor and open with Akmal and Butt.

I also don&#039;t want to believe that there is any corruption involved but I have always believed that a player is either in form or out of form the way our team changes character it is hard to understand. When the odds are against them to win they win and when they are against them to lose they lose these players are quite experienced and as I said if Rauf can stay on the wicket for 83 balls then so could have our regular batsmen.

But I hope that I am wrong on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regards Alam I agree with you if anything I would select Razzak ahead of Alam as You said.</p>
<p>One way to select Fawad is to drop Manzoor and open with Akmal and Butt.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t want to believe that there is any corruption involved but I have always believed that a player is either in form or out of form the way our team changes character it is hard to understand. When the odds are against them to win they win and when they are against them to lose they lose these players are quite experienced and as I said if Rauf can stay on the wicket for 83 balls then so could have our regular batsmen.</p>
<p>But I hope that I am wrong on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ for Stani Army</title>
		<link>http://www.staniarmy.com/pakistan-cricket/pakistan-are-back/#comment-10312</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ for Stani Army</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staniarmy.com/?p=488#comment-10312</guid>
		<description>Wasim,
I understand your frustrations. Just a few years ago, I would have questioned their predictable unpredictability too.

Now I put it down to their lack of professionalism and mental strength. As each of our batsmen came in, they had the same mind set as the one who had gone before, and that was &quot;97? haha? I will play my normal game, if I get out, then my pal who is in next will do it comfortably - no worries&quot;.

What they should have thought is &quot;I&#039;m gonna stay here till the end and help my country across the finishing line. I will guard my wicket with my life&quot;.

The team selection was criticised a lot but that was just frustrated people looking to blame something or someone. Any 8 players we put out there should have got the 97 runs so it has nothing to do with team selection.

Shoaib Malik came in for some criticism but this was only because those that criticised him, supported the inclusion of Fawad Alam, so with Shoaib being the man in possession of that spot, he gets criticised.

Alam, at this point in time, would certainly not be ahead of Malik in my opinion. Whether he should be in the team is a separate issue but not for Malik.

In fact, I would have Razzaq ahead of Alam. Alam did get a few chances under Geoff Lawson in ODIs but he was not able to replicate his domestic form. The international stage is very different and Malik has the edge here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasim,<br />
I understand your frustrations. Just a few years ago, I would have questioned their predictable unpredictability too.</p>
<p>Now I put it down to their lack of professionalism and mental strength. As each of our batsmen came in, they had the same mind set as the one who had gone before, and that was &#8220;97? haha? I will play my normal game, if I get out, then my pal who is in next will do it comfortably &#8211; no worries&#8221;.</p>
<p>What they should have thought is &#8220;I&#8217;m gonna stay here till the end and help my country across the finishing line. I will guard my wicket with my life&#8221;.</p>
<p>The team selection was criticised a lot but that was just frustrated people looking to blame something or someone. Any 8 players we put out there should have got the 97 runs so it has nothing to do with team selection.</p>
<p>Shoaib Malik came in for some criticism but this was only because those that criticised him, supported the inclusion of Fawad Alam, so with Shoaib being the man in possession of that spot, he gets criticised.</p>
<p>Alam, at this point in time, would certainly not be ahead of Malik in my opinion. Whether he should be in the team is a separate issue but not for Malik.</p>
<p>In fact, I would have Razzaq ahead of Alam. Alam did get a few chances under Geoff Lawson in ODIs but he was not able to replicate his domestic form. The international stage is very different and Malik has the edge here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

