Mohsin Khan - A defensive minded coach?

What I saw last Saturday is something I never want associated with Pakistan cricket, and neither is it something I would want to see in sport in general, or in any contest for that matter. To not even try, however small the chance of victory, defies the purpose of playing any sport.

As the Pakistan batsmen came out to bat needing 170 off 21 overs in the final innings of the first Test against Sri Lanka, their fans around the world sat riveted to their TV screens, anticipating an enthralling run chase. But as ball after ball was blocked, it was obvious that going for the win was not what was discussed amongst the Pakistan team management in the interval.

When asked after the game, interim coach Mohsin Khan’s response was “…we felt we didn’t want to make a mess of things…We decided that given the field set, we would opt to bat out time”. Now this is in stark contrast to what the coach was saying just a few days earlier. When speaking of the ‘successful risk’ the Pakistan selectors had taken in picking a young squad for the recent tour of Zimbabwe, Khan said “To achieve a big goal, you have to take risks…As a selector, or now a coach, I won’t be afraid of taking a risk”. Easier said than done, right Mohsin?

170 runs off 21 overs works out at just over 8 runs an over. Now had Pakistan – with 10 wickets in hand, on a docile track – scored 60 off the first 5 overs for example, it would have left them with around 6 and a half runs per over from there on. Suddenly, things don’t seem that impossible do they? Even if Pakistan had lost 2-3 wickets trying to chase the win, they could have still then reined themselves in and started blocking. Sri Lanka would have realised in just a few overs that a draw was on the cards and the captains would have shook hands early, meaning Pakistan wouldn’t have needed to bat out the full 21 overs to then save the game anyway.

While there is an inherent risk of losing wickets whilst playing attacking cricket, there is no guarantee that you won’t lose wickets playing defensively, as Taufiq Umar demonstrated. Now he could quite easily have gone down fighting, losing his wicket whilst attacking rather than the good for nothing manner in which he did. At least we would have then been closer to having some idea of whether a win was possible.

There was an argument that Sri Lanka had no field restrictions and it would have been difficult to score boundaries, yet 2s and 3s could have been picked up relatively comfortably, and would have caused Dilshan to make a few enforced field changes, bringing some players in. As mentioned in Cricinfo’s text commentary, it was a relatively large outfield too.

Many have placed the blame of not attacking squarely on captain Misbah’s head. Yet for me, this would have been a decision influenced by the team management and coach in particular. Another thing that points to this is that former coach Waqar Younis said himself on commentary that he’d have been trying for a win i.e. giving us some insight into the psyche of the Pakistan decision making machine pre-Mohsin Khan. And of course, far from being a yes man, Misbah is not the type to cause discord hence would have gone with the coach’s suggestion. The power dynamic within the Pakistan camp would dictate that a coach would be able to enforce his decision on a captain, rather than a captain on a coach, meaning that even if Misbah would have wanted to go for the chase, he wouldn’t have been able to.

I cannot, for one second, imagine the Australians not going for a win had they been in a similar situation. The attitude Pakistan displayed was not the attitude of winners. If we do not test ourselves, we will never know how good we can become. While drawn Test matches may suit our neighbours over the border, this cautiousness and lack of adventurousness is not the Pakistan way – cornered tigers are braver than that.

Those fans that wanted Pakistan to attack on that last day came in for some harsh criticism with suggestions that a t20 mentality had overtaken them. Yet this is nothing to do with t20 cricket – Pakistan should have at least attempted to go for the 8 an over target regardless. If anything, it is the Test match mentality that has done Test cricket harm here. You don’t play Test cricket to draw. Test cricket is still about the contest, still about trying to win. It is called ‘Test’ cricket after all.

Sport is a test of human endeavour. Great things are achieved, records are broken by people that try, by people that TEST themselves. Having been so far ahead in the game and having dropped so many catches, Pakistan should have wanted to come out and try and win the game to make up for their complacency. They should have felt this urge.

If the thrill of the chase, the courage needed to test oneself is too much for them, then why play at all? Why not just quit cricket altogether, marry an Indian actress, move to Bombay and become an Indian film actor. They certainly have the perfect coach to show them how to do that.

Tabrez Ali Janjua also writes at www.khelopakistan.com

Blind support for Afridi will only encourage bad behaviour

Fans of Shahid Afridi are beginning to portray him as a hero, someone that has sacrificed himself to get rid of the big problem in Pakistan cricket today, Mr Ijaz Butt the chairman. The question is, was Afridi really motivated by getting rid of Butt or has it always been about Afridi and his bitterness over being removed as ODI captain?

When Afridi was removed as captain, Butt stated that he had good reasons to do so and would reveal them in due course. It seems now, from statements made by coach Waqar Younis and manager Intikhab Alam that the reasons were to do with Afridi’s attitude and behaviour both on and off the field. Afridi responded to his sacking  as captain by announcing his conditional retirement, the condition being that the current Pakistan board be removed. His reason for retiring was that he had been humiliated by them. Losing the captaincy for reasons not made public is hardly a humiliation. Supporters of Afridi should remember that it was in fact just him losing the captaincy and that he wasn’t banned from playing and representing his country, and was in fact in the squad for the two ODIs against Ireland. Afridi chose to abandon his country on his own accord. It is why his later excuse that he’d play under any captain doesn’t quite wash.

Of course he did not quit immediately after being stripped of the leadership. He chose to sit out the Irish games using the reason that his father was ill. The problem was that he then turned up a few days later in England, ready to take up his county stint with Hampshire. In Afridi’s head his plan seemed to be going well, that is until the PCB decided to suspend his contract and revoke his No-Objection Certificate (NOC) after he announced his retirement on television with a few scathing remarks towards the board and coach. The revoking of the NOC caused Afridi to run home to Pakistan with his tail between his legs begging for it to be reauthorised. As soon as his NOC was revoked, all of a sudden he was ready to admit breaking the code of conduct and was keen to participate in any other action from the board, whereas before, he couldn’t care less.

A trouble free, unified and happy squad after winning the series in Ireland

Yet where was Afridi’s voice objecting to the PCB and Ijaz Butt whilst he still had his NOC? It seemed whilst Afridi was able to go and play for Hampshire, he had no concern for Pakistan cricket and who was at the helm. Take away his NOC and all of a sudden it’s ‘Afridi retired as a matter of principle against an unfair board’. His words on his return to Pakistan, where he said he had come back for his NOC, say it all. He was picked in the side, not banned from playing and quit himself just because the captaincy was taken away. He did not do it for Pakistan cricket, he did it for himself. It’s the same reason he bats selfishly without a care, and the same reason why he quit the Test captaincy mid-series. He is a loose cannon that needs to be controlled.

Is it possible that through the dislike of Butt, people have lost sight of Afridi’s misdemeanours? Is everything Ijaz Butt does just wrong? Though I am no fan of Ijaz Butt, if we take into the account statements made by Waqar and Intikhab, removing Afridi as captain was the right thing to do for the team. When Afridi did not have the power of captaincy, when he was not the center of attention, he quit serving his country and ran off to County Cricket to earn his money. When the board revoked his NOC, Afridi came crawling back all concerned.

The one good thing that may come out of this is that we may finally see Ijaz Butt removed as PCB chairman. If that were to happen though, it may send a signal to players that every time they disagree with something they can just throw their toys out of the pram and get their way like Afridi. The solution is that if Butt is removed, Afridi must be disciplined severely for the manner in which he went about things. There were clearly other ways of being heard if his sole intention was to get Butt removed for the good of Pakistan cricket.

Misbah Ul-Haq - A man the whole of Pakistan should get behind and be proud of

In captain Misbah Ul-Haq, Pakistan now have the kind of man they have long needed to lead them. Described by Geoff Lawson as having “the best cricket brain and intellect in Pakistan cricket”, Misbah should have been playing for and leading his country a very long time ago. Yet what is perplexing is the amount of criticism he has received recently.

Misbah’s calmness in personality is something that is seen in his batting. It’s been a signature of Misbah to start off slow before accelerating, which has resulted in getting Pakistan out of some big holes in the past. Of course, the danger is that if he falls early in such an innings, he is then open to criticism for playing too slow.

Much of his recent criticism stems from such an innings in the World Cup Semi-Final against India where he was not able to go on and take Pakistan to victory. To criticise him so much for one unsuccessful innings is absurd, and indirectly absolves those batsmen who failed not only in that game but throughout the tournament, a tournament in which Misbah finished as Pakistan’s leading scorer.

It’s fine to criticise but this criticism should be fair. To say that he is match fixing or has some other sinister motive for playing such an innings is unfair, and if weighed up against every good thing that Misbah is, stands out like a sore thumb because it cannot be a correct allegation.

Many may criticise him for using this method of batting but you could say it has developed out of necessity rather than choice, with him having to all too often come in to rescue a batting line up that has collapsed before him. Starting off and getting in is the only sensible way to go about rebuilding things in such circumstances, and Misbah is a sensible man.

“He has a statesman-like demeanour which so many Pakistan captains have lacked and he handles adversity analytically not emotionally. He knows how to get the best out of players and he is a winner, note his outstanding domestic record as a leader.” Geoff Lawson on Misbah Ul-Haq, October 2010

Then there’s the criticism and pure hatred Misbah receives from the Afridi fanatics. It is not Misbah’s fault Afridi has been sacked as captain. That is no reason to hate anyone, particularly your own player and captain.

Serene characters like Misbah are few and far between in Pakistan cricket. We’ve seen the hot-headedness from Younis Khan, Ijaz Butt and Shahid Afridi in recent times and the chaos created by the match-fixers Salman Butt, Mohammeds Asif and Amir. Misbah is a man with such wide ranging qualities (also holds a MBA in business management) that he could easily take up the coaching role or a board position once he retires form playing – something I hope he does. This man should be backed to the hilt.

Whilst he may not be the greatest cricketer in the world, he is not the worst, and as a man and a leader is exactly what Pakistan cricket has needed for a while, especially now.

The outspoken Afridi pays the price

Shahid Afridi has been removed as ODI captain for the upcoming one-day series against Ireland.

The 31-year-old helped guide Pakistan to the semi-finals of the World Cup earlier this year and was also in charge durin the recent 3-2 series victory over the West Indies, but has now been replaced by Misbah-ul-Haq, who will lead the side for the two games against Ireland in Belfast later this month.

“Afridi has been retained as a player in the one-day squad but the captaincy has gone to Misbah” the Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Ijaz Butt said.

Afridi recently spoke out against the PCB and accused them of interfering with his role as captain of the 50-over side during the recent series win in the Caribbean.

Pakistan’s governing body then responded disputing the accusation, and while they refused to give a reason for Afridi leaving the role, they maintained that it was PCB policy to monitor the role of captain on a “series by series basis”.

Afridi stepped down from the test side last summer and returned home following the conclusion of the series against the West Indies.

After that series Afridi was forced to explain himself after comments he made to the media.

“I don’t like people interfering in my domain. I think it would be better if everyone focused on his job in the team.” He said after the 5th ODI game, a remark which landed him in hot water with the PCB.

The 16-man squad including Afridi will now begin preparations for the games against Ireland which get underway on 28th May.

By Pete South

Click here to find the best places to Play ScratchCards

Earlier in the week Afridi promised to do all he could to bring the World Cup trophy home after Pakistan were banned from hosting the tournament alongside India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh following the terrorist attacks of 2009, and he looked to make good on his promise with an impressive bowling performance.

Bigfreebet will have installed Pakistan as clear favourites, but their opponents were poorer than expected and sent down a joint record number of wide balls, unenviably matching the 37 the West Indies bowled in the 1991 tournament.

The Kenyans had begun the game well, and restricted a Pakistan batting attack looking to take advantage of their lesser opponents. Two wickets down with just 12 runs on the board, Kenya looked to replicate the success of the Netherlands against England yesterday by putting pressure on their esteemed opponents.

But the Pakistan middle-order came good as they accelerated through the innings, moving from 129-3 off 28 overs to an imposing 317-7; a figure which always looked out of Kenya’s reach.

Umar Akmal’s pacey innings of 71 from 52 balls lead the way, while Kamran Akmal (55), Younus Khan (50) and Misbah-ul-Haq (65) provided ample support in posting a large score for Kenya to chase.

Kenya completed a miserable day all round as their response failed to get off the ground. Jimmy Kamande’s side lost their last seven wickets for just 39 runs as they fell apart in the face of an aggressive Pakistan bowling unit, led by Afridi.

All-rounder Collins Obuya provided some resistance with a 58-ball innings of 47, one of only four to reach a double figures.

Pakistan will now move on to face Sri Lanka, who also won their opening game at a canter, on Saturday in Colombo. Big free bet will have trouble separating the two closely matched teams as they look to establish themselves as the dominant force in Group A.

By Thomas Rooney

Cricket is a religion in those parts, and while that has enormous benefits it also brings with it the pressure of expectation and the glare of the media spotlight with almost everyone in the country keeping an eye on their latest scores.

Pakistan have had more than their fair share of media attention in recent months, but upon their arrival in Bangladesh the players seemed quietly confident and content to concentrate on matters on the pitch.

Certainly the mood of this Pakistan team is key to their success. They possess the talent but it is their tendency to blow hot and cold that infuriates their passionate support – they know what the players can do, they just don’t always show it.

Their batting line-up stretches down as far as eight, combining a blend of youthful exuberance – think Ahmed Shehzad, Umar Akmal, and Asad Shafiq – with the cool, calm heads of experience like Mohammad Hafeez and Misbah-ul-Haq. Their latest cricket scores heading into the tournament are pretty good, and they will be looking to shine on the biggest stage.

Bowling wise they are obviously weakened by the bans handed down to Mohammed Asif and Mohammed Amir but their strength still lies with the ball.

Shoaib Akhtar and Umar Gul are cricketing warhorses will plenty left still in the tank. Wahab Riaz is growing at international level and will be a useful post-power play back up while spinners Saeed Ajmal and Abdur Rehman have all the capabilities required to extract the maximum out of the sub-continent pitches.

They have all the tools therefore to go far in this competition, but like many Pakistan teams across the years, will they bring those tools with them when it matters?

An irresponsible captain is a bad captain

Earlier today we saw Pakistan lose the first of three Twenty20s to New Zealand, who got home with 2.5 overs to spare. Pakistan had got themselves into at least two good positions to make a game of it, only to surrender meekly.

Chief architect of the downfall was Captain Shahid Afridi. Whilst many would disagree and say he played well for his 20 of 17 balls, it was his gormless shot that triggered a signature collapse. Going at 10 an over after the first 4 overs, Afridi did not have the nous to take advantage of a fast start and begin to rein himself in, keep wickets in hand and then to accelerate later. It was as if he wanted to finish the game in that over. That was his intention, and his shot selection was even worse.

Were it not for Umar Gul and Wahab Riaz, who both made 30, Pakistan would not have ended up with a defendable total of 143. It was at the start of the New Zealand innings that Afridi made his second mistake by opening the bowling with Abdul Razzaq. Even at his best, Razzaq was an average bowler. Having aged and lost some pace, he has become easy pickings for batsmen. Any late good work done by Gul and Wahab was immediately wasted as Razzaq went for 15 off his first over. Suddenly, 143 off 20 overs became 128 off 19. A different game already and New Zealand’s tails were up.

The strange thing is that it wasn’t as if Afridi was limited in choice of who to open the attack with. Wahab, Akhtar and Gul were playing, and we had Ajmal, Hafeez and Afrdi himself to make up any overs remaining. There was no need to bowl Razzaq, even less need to open with him.

While there were a few faces missing from the side, Afridi remained the only real choice as captain. But With Younis back in all forms and Misbah doing well in Tests, Afridi should be replaced before the 50 0ver format World Cup begins in February. We cannot have the captain playing carelessly, not thinking of the team, and making bad choices especially in a tournament format where one bad game can mean the flight home.

Pakistan's new Test captain Misbah Ul-Haq showed the way with three half-centuries in four innings

Pakistan can come out of the drawn two-Test series against world number two South Africa with their heads held high. Though the argument may be that the wickets in the UAE were batsmen friendly, Pakistan’s reconstructed batting line up still held it’s own against South Africa’s, and South Africa had the better bowling attack. Let us also remember that Pakistan’s batsmen have struggled to pass 250 in Tests for a while now, batting paradise or not. Were it not for the time factor, Pakistan could have come close to or matched South Africa’s aggregated total in both the Tests, and that’s no mean feat.

The return of Younis Khan was a major factor in the ability of our batsmen to finally start playing Test match innings and setting Test match totals. The successful re-emergence of Mohammad Hafeez, Misbah Ul-Haq and Taufeeq Umar was also pleasing to watch. I have always been a big fan of Taufiq yet he is just one of many that have been the victim of selection favouritism in the past. He is a proper Test batsman.

Then there’s the emergence of the two youngsters Azhar Ali and Asad Shafiq. For some reason, Azhar, despite being a reserved young man, seems to really irritate the opposition, ending up at the receiving end of some hostile bowling. He did so in England and here against South Africa also. But his composure and temperament was a joy to see. Shafiq came into the ODI side in England and you could immediately tell the young man was going to be here to stay. I was hoping to see him in the Test side much sooner as it was clear he had what it took to succeed. He got his chance in the 2nd Test though, in place of the out of form Umar Akmal, and he didn’t disappoint with a well played 61 in the first innings.

The biggest positive after the performance of our batsmen was the captaincy and personal performances of Misbah Ul-Haq. Amongst his supporters, of which I am one, Misbah could and should have been Pakistan’s captain years ago. But as the fixing scandals have revealed, people were in and out of the Pakistan team for reasons other than cricket back then. Hopefully Misbah will continue his good form and still provide us with a few good years during which time a younger future captain can be identified.

And last but not least, we must mention Abdur Rehman. The left arm spinner has been in almost every squad in recent times but rarely gets a game. He is the type of cricketer that, though he may be limited in natural ability, makes the most out of what he has got. He reminds me very much of England’s Michael Yardy. You know what you will get with these guys – good team players that will always play their part, with bat or ball. Maybe Pakistan need a few more of this type of player rather than the natural gifted types, that blow more cold than hot.

The only concern now is with the bowling attack. Had we had Mohammad Asif and Amir in the side, it would be no over-exaggeration to say that we may have even come out of this series as victors. It was unfortunate that Wahab went down with an injury and it is now clearer than ever that Mohammad Sami is just not good enough for the game at the top level. I still remain hopeful that Amir will be allowed back into international cricket and that alone really could make the difference to our Test team bowling attack.

There was almost a resigned pointlessness to Pakistan playing Tests not so long ago, due to the depressing manner in which we capitulated. But the character and heart shown by the players in the performances in these two games has given the Stani fans lots of hope.

RELATED POLL RESULTS. HOW DID YOU DO?

How will Pakistan do under new captain Misbah Ul-Haq in the two game Test series against South Africa in the UAE?
* 0-2 Loss (29%, 9 Votes)
* 0-1 Loss (26%, 8 Votes)
* Draw (23%, 7 Votes)
* 2-0 Win (16%, 5 Votes)
* 1-0 Win (6%, 2 Votes)

Will Mohammad Sami be seen in a Pakistan shirt again?
* No, it’s time to move on (42%, 5 Votes)
* Yes, but he shouldn’t be (33%, 4 Votes)
* Yes, he still has what it takes (25%, 3 Votes)

My team: Hafeez, Shafiq, Younis, Misbah, U. Akmal, Razzaq, Afridi, Zulquarnain, Gul, Ajmal, Akhtar.

A number of things need to come off for Pakistan to be challenging in this ODI series against a powerful and adept One Day South African side; a side which has won it’s last five ODI matches.

Firstly, our openers need to form a partnership of at least 50 even if it comes up in the 14th over. With wickets in hand and Razzaq and Misbah (hopefully) coming in lower down, the score can be accelerated later on. Wickets in hand will also allow Umar Akmal to play his more natural and attacking game rather than getting confused and stuck at the crease trying to throw down the anchor. Younis also needs to quickly find form and glue the innings together.

As for the bowlers; Gul needs to step up to the mark and help out Shoaib, and Saeed Ajmal needs to rediscover his wicket taking abilities. Maybe concentrating on conventional spin and bowling slower will help. The contribution of Mohammad Hafeez with the ball will have a big say in our success in restricting the South Africans. Ideally, I wouldn’t want Razzaq bowling. If we have to go to him then he should be given a few overs in the middle part of the innings when things slow down. Going in with the team above, we would be able to bowl 50 overs without the use of Razzaq yet that does not take into account a bowler having an off day. Hence, Razzaq may well be used.

With the World Cup around the corner, the coach and the captain should be looking to experiment and get some idea of the make up of their squad, one which they will hopefully be consulted on. Players will want to do well and I hope some of the players on the periphery are given the chance to do so in this series.