With its recent handing out of punishments, the PCB is trying to send out a message to its players that the days of player power are over. It is why I could not help wondering if they would have been better served handing out rolling monthly contracts until the end of the year rather than tie themselves down to the full one-year contracts, back-dated to January 2010.
I will not go into the details of who was deserving of which category here, as Osman Samiuddin has already done a good job of that, but I wanted to consider whether it would have been a good thing to give out monthly contracts instead.
Whilst a year may be a short time in terms of employment contracts, we have seen that in Pakistan cricket, it is a very long time. A rolling contract would have kept the players on their toes and on their best behaviour, knowing that the slightest misdemeanour would mean potentially losing their contract. It would also give them incentive to do well when playing in games. I think many of the players named would have breathed a sigh of relief after the contracts were announced.
One positive addition is the new stipend category for top domestic performers and youngsters that show potential. It is a good thing for the domestic players as it will encourage them to perform whilst keeping pressure on those that occupy the International first-team places. It is also good for the young, up-and-coming Pakistan players as it gives them an incentive to turn their cricket into a career to make a living out of rather than a hobby which they eventually give up on and end up vanishing into obscurity. I think this is a very important step in sorting out the structure of Pakistan cricket lower down the cricketing chain. It will certainly have a positive knock-on effect, I believe, in years to come.
Read the rest of this entry »
28